The advantages of cognitive offloading: increased productivity and efficiency
Some of the reasons for the appeal and usefulness of cognitive offloading tools are obvious. When people no longer have to struggle with tasks they find burdensome, they can devote more energy to things that are truly important to them. For example, when AI takes over the visual design of a presentation, humans can concentrate on the content.
The fact that people find tasks tedious often indicates that the human mind is not optimised for these tasks, which is why technical aids achieve better results here. Very few people can reliably multiply three-digit numbers in their heads – a calculator is both more reliable and faster. Experiments also suggest that the use of digital tools can free up cognitive resources, enabling an increase in productivity and efficiency. Various studies have examined these relationships in detail (e.g. Gerlich: AI Tools in Society; Grinschgl/Papenmeier/Meyerhoff: Consequences of cognitive offloading).
Many industries are taking advantage of this effect. For example, modern AI systems can analyse large amounts of data, recognise patterns, determine probabilities of risk or fraud, and thus significantly speed up both claims processing and the creation of personalised tariff offers. People are relieved of tasks that would have taken them much longer to complete and can devote themselves to tasks where humans are irreplaceable, such as communicating competently with customers and partners. Stan Bowers from Spear Technologies provides an overview.
But cognitive relief can improve life beyond the workplace. Many people, especially older people, have to cope with cognitive limitations. When memory and concentration decline, digital tools can help compensate for deficits. Studies even suggest that regular, competent use of computers or smartphones trains the mind in such a way that cognitive performance is not lost in the first place. The use of digital technologies appears to have a similar preventive effect to physical activity (Benge/Scullin: A meta-analysis of technology use and cognitive ageing).
Cognitive offloading also brings problems
However, the use of tools for mental offloading also has disadvantages. The basic dilemma: the brain becomes more efficient when you use it. If you spare your brain, you risk losing abilities.
- Studies on the so-called ‘Google effect’ show that outsourcing cognitive tasks can lead to people remembering where to find information rather than retaining the content itself in their memory.
- This also impairs mental penetration and understanding of the content. Because when we want to memorise something, we usually try to understand it first. This impulse is eliminated when we simply remember that the information can be found at a specific link if needed.
- Heavy reliance on AI tools can weaken our own analytical and creative abilities.
- Search engine and social media algorithms create echo chambers of like-minded people. The ability to critically question one's own opinions in the face of counterarguments becomes weaker.
- The theory of ‘digital dementia’ (Manfred Spitzer) claims that heavy smartphone and internet use can cause symptoms similar to dementia, especially in young people. However, these findings are highly controversial.
Overall, however, there seems to be good evidence to support the assumption that cognitive offloading can lead to dependence on external tools and less productive independence. The aforementioned study by Michael Gerlich on the effects of AI warns that the use of large language models can increase productivity but reduce learning ability, critical thinking and judgement.
For companies, there is a risk of losing employee expertise: if young professionals rely on AI tools from the outset, they may not be able to develop the analytical and creative skills they need to perform tasks without technical support. They may not even be able to assess the quality of AI performance. At some point, AI will be the only benchmark for professional standards, and humans will lose the ability to manage the company.
What can be done? Competent use of digital tools
How can we reap the benefits of cognitive relief without having to accept the disadvantages? It is important to strike a balance between the desire for efficiency and the goal of developing human skills. After all, the brain's performance capabilities are astonishing – and rarely exploited to their full potential.
- Education and training should specifically focus on critical thinking and problem solving. The ability to critically assess the capabilities and limitations of AI is becoming increasingly important.
- Work processes should be designed in such a way that there is room for professional assessments by humans. Above all, risk assessments, the evaluation of long-term consequences and ethical questions should remain the domain of humans.
- In everyday life, we would do well not to use all the possibilities that technology offers us. Our own constantly updated general and specialist knowledge, our own analytical and creative abilities, and a good memory remain key life skills. Without them, there will continue to be no above-average professional success.
Further suggestions are provided by Raquel Loga from IE University in Madrid.
Competent use of relief tools sometimes requires digital abstinence. Perhaps the self-discipline required for this will itself become a central goal in qualification and personality development in the future. The path to this goal begins in school and family. But vocational training must also impart knowledge about the limits of the sensible use of digital tools. After all, relief is not an end in itself: happiness and success, creativity and productivity cannot be achieved without mental effort.