4.6 out of 5 stars is great, of course. If there is ever any criticism: what are people most likely to criticise?
Uta Fröbel: People are most critical about the time-consuming registration process. Then sometimes registration does not work because the transaction authentication number (TAN) has expired or the name does not match. From a customer's point of view, the registration process really is a little clunky. Otherwise, there is really no one issue that comes up again and again.
And why is the registration process so complicated?
Rainer Asselborn: When it comes to providing access to a person’s electronic health record, for example, of course we need to ensure that the person who registers is really the customer he or she claims to be. We have a two-stage process to ensure this in which we send the customer a one-off TAN by SMS text or letter. And, of course, that is annoying first and foremost – customers want to get started right away as soon as they have installed the app.
The same applies to issuing the password. Customers need to assign a complicated local code. However, these are requirements from the IT Security department, which are binding for us – unfortunately we have to impose this on our customers as well. We are providing the app as a tool for managing sensitive health information. And we all know that the more secure it is, the more inconvenient it unfortunately also is. But we are happy that we were able to retrofit the Face ID and Touch ID functions a year and a half ago. That was a feature that people asked for again and again. We spent a long time discussing whether this was sufficiently secure for our app until we got the nod from IBM: yes, it is adequately secure, we can provide it. There was a sigh of relief in many places.
Apart from the reviews, are there any customer surveys or market research relating to the app?
Uta Fröbel: We always survey customers when we call them. Our colleagues listen very carefully to what our customers have to say, record it, and pass it on to me. Our backlog is full of ideas and requests. And we very quickly see what really matters to customers. Apart from the stability and reliability of the app, they often comment on the design, which is also very important. And they are concerned about having processes that are understandable. Our customers want to understand what they are doing and what will then happen. When they submit a receipt, they want to see whether the document has arrived, what its status is, and when they can expect payment.
What's next? What new features are in the pipeline?
Rainer Asselborn: What we can say at this juncture is that there will be a new version of the app out soon. And apart from minor bug fixes, there will also be functions that have been developed in-house in our Digital Factory. Among others, there will be links to the “My Supplementary Insurance” portal, we will incorporate FAQs on submitting receipts, and will explicitly link to the ERGO blog. And we are still in discussions with colleagues from the Digital Factory and from the various specialist departments about how we can provide healthcare and care services. Next year, we will be working intensively on electronic patient medical records. That will definitely be a challenge.
Interview: Kristina Tewes